Making Money Theory v3 is a book-length framework about the part of earning that does not change when a method, platform or trend becomes obsolete. It deliberately avoids "the best side hustle" or "the next opportunity" and asks a more durable question: why does money flow to some people and not others?
Its core claim is that four things are constantly confused: value (what you create for others), price (what the market pays for it), income (what actually reaches you), and wealth (whether that income can support the life you want). A person can create value without getting paid, and can get paid without creating equivalent value. The first job of the theory is to pull these apart.
v3 = causal mechanism Γ value vector Γ value flow. The causal mechanism explains why a transaction happens; the six rulers evaluate how healthy it is; value flow traces where the money and costs actually go.
Money is not created by "working hard" or "catching a wave". It is an observable by-product of a change in a situation. The basic chain is:
need or problem β action and mechanism β change in outcome β value created or destroyed
A simple example: someone cannot fix a computer; you fix it; their problem shrinks; they are willing to exchange money for that result; you receive income. Three different things exist in that story β contribution (how much your action caused the result), value (how the situation improved on several dimensions), and price (what was actually paid in a specific exchange).
| Concept | What it means | Who or what judges it |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Performance across multiple dimensions | No single judge; market, third parties, long-term results and feedback are different kinds of evidence |
| Contribution | Attributable effect on the outcome | Counterfactual analysis, not mere correlation |
| Price | The monetary terms of a specific exchange | The exchange mechanism: market, platform, bargaining power, pricing power |
| Income | Money flowing to a particular actor | The distribution mechanism |
| Wealth | Assets and rights a person controls | Property, law, finance and the conditions that preserve them |
Price can be high because of scarcity, monopoly, bargaining power or timing β not because social value is high. Free work can be valuable. The theory refuses to collapse these into a single number.
Earning is not a solitary act. Every earning process is checked against six independent dimensions:
| Ruler | Question it asks |
|---|---|
| π‘ Security | If you lose the ability to sell or work, can you still maintain basic life and necessary protection? |
| π Choice | How many real options do you have, and can you exit a bad relationship? |
| βοΈ Labor | How much irreversible time, energy and other cost did you spend? More labor does not mean more value. |
| π― Contribution | How much would the outcome change without your action, other things being comparable? |
| π₯ Incentive | What behavior does the reward structure encourage, and does it keep improving results? |
| π‘ Meaning | Does this activity help you live a life you actually endorse? |
The rulers are not six scores to be added up. They use different evidence, different units and different evaluation methods. When they conflict β for example, efficiency rises while workers lose options β the conflict must be made visible, not averaged away.
v3 compresses dozens of failure modes into one diagnostic idea: every failure is an imbalance among the six rulers, plus a blockage in value flow.
| Symptom | Main imbalance |
|---|---|
| You cannot survive without the next payment | Security |
| You earn well but dare not quit | Choice |
| You make money and destroy your body | Labor |
| You do most of the work but capture little of the gain | Contribution |
| The harder you work, the more you are squeezed | Incentive |
| The more you earn, the emptier or more harmful it feels | Meaning |
| The platform takes most of the revenue | Value flow |
| AI raises efficiency but workers receive none of the benefit | Labor + value flow |
Money to be especially careful with:
The theory's target outcome is not a single win but win-win plus compounding trust. An exchange has four steps, and each can jam: the need is not recognized, the solution is unreliable, the price is unaffordable, or the money is intercepted before it reaches the supplier.
A healthy earning system therefore asks six flow questions: who created the value; who bore the necessary labor and costs; who received the income; who holds pricing, distribution and exit power; whether the income returns to actors with real needs; and whether the current distribution damages future production and consumption.
| Risk check | Healthy | Warning | Danger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue concentration | Top client < 20% | 20β50% | > 50% |
| Platform dependence | Own channels primary | Mixed | Single platform |
| Cash flow | Consistently positive | Occasionally negative | Chronically negative |
| Legal risk | Fully compliant | Partly grey | Clearly illegal |
| Health cost | Recoverable | Partly irreversible | Severely irreversible |
| Time input | Sustainable | Occasional overdraw | Chronic overdraw |
| Sense of meaning | Sufficient long term | Occasional absence | Chronic absence |
Any "danger" cell means the way you earn needs immediate adjustment. The practical antidotes are diversification of platforms, clients, products and income; owning your own channel and brand; designing exit terms in advance; and deliberately shifting efficiency gains into fewer necessary work hours rather than only more output.
This is a high-level English overview. The full book β including all chapters, cases and the six-ruler
checklist β is currently available in Chinese only.
π Read Full Chinese Version β
β Back to English Home
Based on the Chinese original Β· Making Money Theory v3 Β· FunnyAI